“Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, I’m Standing Here Today Alive”

A former Obamacare opponent asks Congress to preserve the law that saved his life.

This January, Jeff Jeans, an Arizona small business owner and cancer survivor, confronted House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc) at a town hall meeting broadcast on CNN. “Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, I’m standing here today alive,” he told Ryan. Why then, Jeans asked, would “you repeal the Affordable Care Act without a replacement?”

“We wouldn’t do that. We want to replace it with something better,” Ryan replied before talking about his mother-in-law’s bouts with cancer. “People just have these things,” Ryan said. “And we don’t want people to go poor or go bankrupt because this thing happens to them.” Instead of Obamacare’s exchanges, Ryan said he would favor state high-risk pools to protect people with pre-existing conditions.

Six months later, Jeans, who is 54, worries that the replacement legislation crafted by Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would do just that. McConnell announced Tuesday that the Senate won’t be voting on his bill this week, but he plans to revive the effort next month when senators return from the Fourth of July recess.

The Senate bill would make it easier for states to waive Obamacare’s list of essential health benefits—10 categories of treatment that all insurance policies must cover, such as hospital stays, prescription medications, and mental health care. And by erasing essential benefits, states could end up removing annual and lifetime caps for those procedures, which limit out-of-pocket costs for consumers. The market could revert back to the pre-Obamacare days, when insurance policies would leave people unprotected when they need insurance the most.

Jeans learned that lesson first hand. His wife needed an operation before Obamacare went into effect. By the time they learned she had a “junk” policy that didn’t cover most of the cost of her hospitalization, it was too late. They ended up paying about $16,000 out-of-pocket for a $24,000 procedure, he says.

If the Senate bill becomes law, millions more would have no insurance at all. The Congressional Budget Office found that the Senate’s health care bill would leave 15 million additional people uninsured next year. By 2026, 22 million more people would lack insurance than under current law. Jeans believes the bill breaks Trump’s campaign promises to protect the elderly and people with pre-existing conditions. “Everything that’s come out of that Congressional Budget Office score is that they definitely don’t confirm those standards,” Jeans says. “They contradict them.”

Jeans used to oppose the Affordable Care Act, too. He’d volunteered for Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaigns and swore he’d never comply with Obamacare. That changed when he was diagnosed with cancer in 2012 and was given six weeks to live. He was uninsured and offered to pay cash for his treatment, but it was rejected by every radiology and chemotherapy office Jeans’ wife reached out to. Instead, he ended up obtaining a policy in a temporary high-risk pool created by the ACA, which he credits with keeping him alive. His chemotherapy and radiation started the day his insurance took effect. These days, he runs a Facebook page called Obamacare Saved My Life.

When it comes to the high-risk pools that Ryan favors, Jeans isn’t so optimistic. Obamacare devoted $5 billion to high-risk pools as a temporary measure to help people until the ban on preexisting condition discrimination in the regular insurance market went into effect in 2014. But those risk pools proved inadequate, falling far short on funds needed to cover people with preexisting conditions. Enrollment peaked at a little more than 100,000, and in March 2013 the program froze out new enrollees as it struggled to keep up with costs. Jeans was lucky to get into the pool before the freeze out. After the Obamacare exchanges launched in 2014, the high-risk pools became obsolete because people with preexisting conditions could buy any health care plan. 

Jeans is simply asking Republicans not to take away people’s health care. “Americans shouldn’t be afraid that their health care is going to change every four-to-eight years,” he says. “Every American should have stability in their health care.”

 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate