Jeff Sessions Won’t Appoint a Second Special Counsel—For Now

Republicans have been demanding an investigation into the FBI and DOJ

Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks in Sacramento, California earlier this month.Randy Pench/TNS via ZUMA Wire

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday declined to appoint a second special counsel, who would be charged with investigating matters related to a series of 2016 probes related to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. But Sessions left open the possibility of making such an appointment in the future.

Last year—after Sessions’ deputy, Rod Rosenstein, appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election—GOP lawmakers began urging Sessions to use the same statute to appoint a prosecutor to investigate the Department of Justice and the FBI. In the months that followed, more Republicans have piled on, suggesting that a new special counsel probe could look into the handling of investigations into Clinton’s emails and foundation, as well as allegations that the FBI abused the process for obtaining a secret warrant in order to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

In a letter Thursday, Sessions declined to make such an appointment—for now. He argued that the circumstances do not necessarily warrant the a second special counsel at this time. In place of a special counsel, Sessions stressed that concerns raised by Republicans are being investigated by the Justice Department Inspector General as well as by the US attorney in Utah, John Huber, whom Sessions has personally tasked with determining whether a special counsel is warranted and what other steps the Justice Department should take. The letter was addressed to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.).

These three Republicans and others have advocated a special counsel to open investigations into matters related to Clinton’s use of a private email server, her family foundation, and the bogus Uranium One “scandal.” In March, Goodlatte and Gowdy informed Sessions that a special counsel should also investigate alleged FBI misdeeds documented in the infamous Nunes Memo, which alleged that the bureau improperly obtained a surveillance warrant on Page. Trump’s personal attorney, Jay Sekulow, has also publicly called on Sessions to appoint a special counsel to investigate the FBI.

Sessions’ involvement in a decision to appoint a special counsel—or even his decision to respond to these requests—is in apparent violation of his repeated promises to recuse himself from investigations related to Clinton and the presidential campaign. Though he declined to appoint a special counsel Thursday, he did not bow out of the decision-making process. “Please contact me personally if you have any additional questions or concerns,” Sessions told the Republicans in his letter.

THIS IS BIG FOR US.

And we won't beat around the bush: Our fundraising drive to finish our current budget on June 30 and start our new fiscal year on July 1 is lagging behind where we need it to be.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please consider joining your fellow readers with a donation to help make it all possible. Whether you can pitch in $5 or $500, it all matters.

If you're new to Mother Jones or aren't yet sold on supporting our nonprofit reporting, please take a moment to read Monika Bauerlein's post about our priorities after these chaotic several years, and why this relatively quiet moment is also an urgent one for our democracy and Mother Jones’ bottom line—and if you find it compelling, please join us.

payment methods

THIS IS BIG FOR US.

And we won't beat around the bush: Our fundraising drive to finish our current budget on June 30 and start our new fiscal year on July 1 is lagging behind where we need it to be.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please consider joining your fellow readers with a donation to help make it all possible. Whether you can pitch in $5 or $500, it all matters.

If you're new to Mother Jones or aren't yet sold on supporting our nonprofit reporting, please take a moment to read Monika Bauerlein's post about our priorities after these chaotic several years, and why this relatively quiet moment is also an urgent one for our democracy and Mother Jones’ bottom line—and if you find it compelling, please join us.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate