Rohrabacher Says He’s Fine With Housing Discrimination Against Gay People

“We’ve drawn a line on racism, but I don’t think we should extend that line.”

Rep. Dana Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.)Sipa/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Channeling his inner Masterpiece Cakeshop, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, the embattled Republican congressman representing coastal Orange County, California, told a group of real estate agents last week that homeowners should be able to refuse to sell their houses to people because of their sexual orientation.

“Every homeowner should be able to make a decision not to sell their home to someone [if] they don’t agree with their lifestyle,” Rohrabacher said in a May 16 meeting with a delegation from the Orange County Association of Realtors, according to the Orange County Register.

Wayne Woodyard, a Realtor who attended the meeting, told Buzzfeed News that Rohrabacher’s comments came in response to a question asked about the Fair and Equal Housing Act, a bill that would ban housing discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Woodyard said Rohrabacher “came unglued,” and stated that he would not support the bill.

His comments cost him the support of the 1.3 million-member National Association of Realtors, which pulled its endorsement of Rohrabacher after Woodyard posted the congressman’s comments in a closed Facebook group for LGBT Realtors.

In an interview with the OC Register, Rohrabacher claimed  that he opposes housing discrimination in all forms. However, he said, “There are some fundamentalist Christians who do not approve of their lifestyle. I support their rights.” He added, “We’ve drawn a line on racism, but I don’t think we should extend that line.” He also noted that his position will “alienate a certain number of gays who think I’m anti-gay, which isn’t the case.”

“Dana’s comments are disturbing and show why we need to move Orange County forward. Hatred and bigotry have no place in America,” says Harley Rouda, one of Rohrabacher’s Democratic challengers. “This can’t be excused away by a generation gap or the Congressman’s eccentricities,” said Hans Keirstead, another Democratic candidate, in a statement. Omar Siddiqui, another candidate in the crowded Democratic field, called Rohrabacher’s comments “despicable” and “immoral.”

In a statement, the National Association of Realtors announced, “After reviewing all new, relevant information, it was determined that Rep. Rohrabacher will no longer receive support from NAR’s President’s Circle… The association’s member Code of Ethics is far ahead of Congress on gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. We certainly hope that Congress will…support the elimination of housing discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate