Does Your State Let Parents Refuse Vaccines for “Philosophical Reasons”?

“I have no clue what the hell is going on in Idaho.”

Jovanmandic/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The scientific evidence in favor of vaccines is solid. But many parents don’t immunize their children, citing religious or “philosophical beliefs.” In many states, it’s easy for parents to opt-out of school-mandated vaccinations for kids—which leaves pockets of the population unvaccinated, and puts children at risk of otherwise-preventable infectious outbreaks, like measles, whooping cough, and HPV.

Without the vast majority of a population vaccinated against diseases, or “herd immunity,” unvaccinated children become more likely to spread diseases to infants or people with weak immune systems.

While some states have cracked down on nonmedical exemptions, 18 states still allow parents not to vaccinate their children on the basis of philosophical beliefs. One of those beliefs is the thoroughly-debunked myth that vaccines cause autism—which has caused an untold number of parents in the US to avoid vaccines. (The states where nonmedical exemptions are permitted include Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin.)

Between 2009 and 2016, researchers documented an increase in the number of kids enrolling in kindergarten with non-medical exemptions in 12 of the 18 states with belief exemptions. The group, from Baylor University, Baylor College of Medicine, Rice University, and Texas A&M, also identified several metropolitan “hotspots” where vaccine exemptions pose the biggest risk to children: Seattle, Portland, Houston, Phoenix, Detroit, and Kansas City stood out in the data set for their high exemption numbers. The results published Tuesday in the journal PLOS Medicine.

County-level non-medical exemption rates, 2016-2017

PLOS

Counties with >400 kindergarteners with non-medical exemptions, 2016-2017

PLOS

Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine and an author on the study, noted that the problem is especially acute in Idaho. In the small city of Camas, Idaho, for example, about 27 percent of kindergartners entered school with a non-medical exemption in 2016, the highest in the country, the study found. In Bonner, Idaho, it was about 20 percent. In Boise, 16 percent. In fact, Idaho is home to eight of the ten counties in the United States with the highest rates of unvaccinated kindergartners. 

“I have no clue what the hell is going on in Idaho,” Hotez says. “It’s pretty stark.”

Hotez said he plans to conduct future research on why certain counties, including those in Idaho, may have such high exemption rates. One possible explanation is anti-vaccine campaigning. “Our findings indicate that new foci of anti-vaccine activities are being established in major metropolitan areas, rendering select cities vulnerable for vaccination-preventable diseases,” the authors write

In states where nonmedical exemptions are not allowed, research shows that vaccination rates are higher, meaning communities are at less risk of an outbreak. In this study, researchers showed a related statistic to be true: states that allowed nonmedical exemptions did in fact have lower kindergarten vaccine coverage.  

Himself the father of a child with autism, Hotez believes that scientists are partially to blame for the rise of anti-vaccine pseudo-science. “As a scientific profession, we’ve been very inward-looking,” he says. “We’re so fixed on our grants and papers that we don’t think about engaging the public.” 

Hotez hopes his research will inform discussions about vaccines and help eliminate disinformation spread by anti-vaccine lobbyists. “This is not a time to be complacent,” he says. “We need to push back against some of these anti-vaccine movements in the United States.” 

This post has been updated to reflect that the study’s authors are affiliated with Baylor University, as well as the Baylor College of Medicine, an independent institution.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate