Alabama Republican Who Refused to Back Trump Faces Runoff

This is the cost of saying sexual assault is wrong.

Rep. Martha Roby

Rep. Martha Roby (R-Ala.) on the Capitol stepsBill Clark/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In October 2016, Rep. Martha Roby made a decision that seemed reasonable at the time—she revoked her endorsement of Donald Trump after hearing him brag about groping women on the now-infamous Access Hollywood video. “I cannot look my children in the eye and justify a vote for a man who promotes and boasts about sexually assaulting women,” the Alabama Republican said at the time.

But it turns out that in the Alabama Republican Party, speaking out against alleged sexual predators isn’t always a winning political strategy.

Tonight, the four-term congresswoman failed to win a majority in the GOP primary contest for the state’s 2nd Congressional District, according to news outlets’ projections. With 73 percent of precincts reporting, Roby had secured just 38 percent of the vote—a sharp decline from the 66 percent she won in the 2016 primary, which took place seven months before the Access Hollywood video surfaced. Former Rep. Bobby Bright was on track to finish second in the 2018 race. The two will meet in a runoff later this summer.

The primary results come less than six months after former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, a Republican, lost a special election for the US Senate to Democrat Doug Jones. Despite the fact that during the campaign, Moore faced accusations of having sexually assaulting teenage girls years earlier, Trump vocally supported Moore. During the Moore scandal, Roby stayed silent.

On policy matters, Roby has proven herself a loyal Republican, voting with the Trump White House 97 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight. Throughout her campaign, she has emphasized her support for signature Trump policies, such as a border wall and the tax cuts. But her primary opponents—including Bright, a former Democrat who lost the seat to Roby in 2010 and later switched parties, and Rich Hobson, who was Moore’s former campaign manager and longtime aide—positioned themselves as fervent Trumpists. Both tried to capitalize on Roby’s 2016 criticism of Trump.

Roby was also challenged by state Rep. Barry Moore. In an interview with the Montgomery Advertiser, Moore accused Roby of throwing Trump “under the bus” at a time when her support was needed.

“I do believe Republicans should support the Republican nominee,” Hobson told the Advertiser, referring to the 2016 presidential race.

In one campaign spot, Bright reminded viewers that he voted for Trump, and he blasted “Republican insiders” in Washington for “turning their backs on our president.”

Another Bright ad was more direct, criticizing Roby for having “turned her back on President Trump when he needed her most” and showing 2016 footage of her asking Trump to leave the presidential race.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate