No One Loves Donald Trump More Than Vladimir Putin

Here are 10 actions taken by the US president that boost long-held Kremlin goals.

Hamburg, Germany, July 2017Mikhail Klimentyev/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

With his efforts to help Donald Trump become president by meddling in the 2016 election, Vladimir Putin has already done more to advance Russia’s foreign policy goals and worldview than anything he could have imagined in his wildest dreams as a longtime KGB agent. He has succeeded in sowing discord in the West without firing a shot, at low cost and with relatively few consequences (save for some limited sanctions against Russian oligarchs) as the Kremlin continues nefarious cyber and propaganda activities around the globe.

“One of Putin’s chief aims,” says Charles Kupchan, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, “is to weaken and divide the West. Trump is playing right into the Kremlin’s hands, doing Putin’s job for him.” Or, as human rights activist and former world chess champion Garry Kasparov says, Trump is “ticking every box on Putin’s wish list.”

At a rally in Montana last week, Trump mocked critics for calling out the Russian president’s history as a Soviet intelligence official. “Putin is fine,” Trump said.

As the two leaders prepare to shake hands again in Helsinki on July 16, here are 10 actions that Trump has taken in office that align with long-held Kremlin goals. Amazingly, many of these steps would have been anathema to the Republican Party going back decades, but they have all been accepted with barely a peep from today’s GOP. 

Climate denial

By opting out of the global climate agreement and taking other steps to weaken fuel standards and clean air regulations, Trump has effectively sided with the fossil fuel industry, a Putin-pleasing position since oil and gas are the most important pillars of the Russian economy.

Nuking the Iran deal

By unilaterally withdrawing the United States from the multinational Iran nuclear agreement, Trump has demonstrated that the United States is not a reliable negotiating partner that can be trusted to stand by its agreements with other Western powers. Potential sanctions against Iran’s oil industry have also contributed to driving up global oil prices, putting more money in Putin’s coffers. 

Stoking trade chaos

By withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific trade pact, threatening to withdraw from the World Trade Organization, and threatening to jettison NAFTA—as well as implementing tariffs on America’s closest trading partners—Trump may be putting the United States on the precipice of a highly disruptive trade war with China, Europe, Canada, and Mexico. Trump’s tariffs alone are alienating key allies, weakening the US economy and upending the rule-based international trading system.

War on the free press

By constantly attacking the US media as “fake news” and with the Stalinesque parlance “enemy of the people,” Trump has undermined the free press as an important component of democracy—also doing so by echoing Russian propaganda techniques that leave citizens less able to discern truth from lies.

Love for authoritarians

By praising dictators and tyrants (Putin, Kim Jong Un, Rodrigo Duterte, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and others), and by degrading top US allies (Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Theresa May), Trump undercuts long-standing American leadership built on shared democratic values and the rule of law.

Targeting friends

By attacking the NATO Alliance and the European Union (by backing Brexit), Trump weakens the foundation of American foreign policy for the last seven decades along with NATO’s stand in opposition to Russia expansion. Weakening the Western alliance has been a goal of Russian foreign policy since shortly after World War II.

Shrugging off aggression

By saying that Putin should be allowed to return to the G-7, made up of the world’s richest industrialized nations, Trump shows his indifference to, if not acceptance of, Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its takeover of Crimea—which Trump justified because the local population “speaks Russian”. (He also blamed Barack Obama for it.) This undermined previous multilateral sanctions against Russia led by the United States. 

Pandering to Kim Jong Un 

By suspending US military defense exercises with South Korea—essentially agreeing with Kim Jong Un that they were “provocative” war games—Trump has made the US defense posture weaker in Asia and again made the US seem to be a less reliable military partner to its key allies. 

Punting on Syria

Despite limited missile strikes, the Trump administration seems to have no coherent policy in Syria. By declaring the defeat of ISIS there, and by telling US military leaders he wants American troops out, Trump has weakened the US ability to counter Russian (and Iranian) dominance in Syria, giving them a freer hand in their support of the Assad regime. 

Abdicating on human rights

By discarding human rights concerns in his meetings with autocratic foreign leaders, Trump has squandered American soft power, contributing further to an erosion of US moral authority around the world and fueling American unpopularity.

Trump has shown himself to be capable of destabilizing the existing world order, but he seems incapable of building better alliances and strengthening democracies, the heart a global doctrine led by the US for nearly 70 years. In its place, Trump seems to be creating a world of bilateral power politics—one in which Russia, China, and other authoritarian states can excel. Far from making America great again, Trump has diminished the US in the eyes of most of the democratic free world while making Putin seem more statesmanlike. Putin must feel he has already gotten a full return on his investment in Trump, and that he can look forward to the possibility of America’s global stature diminishing further in the years ahead.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate