September 30, 2018

Sen. Lindsey Graham Spent Another Morning Defending Kavanaugh

“You’re trying to portray him as a stumbling, bumbling, drunk gang rapist.”

Win McNamee/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Since allegations of sexual assault have surfaced against Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C) has emerged as one of his most impassioned defenders. He continued this work today during an appearance on ABC’s This Week.

Just days ago, as the Senate Judiciary Committee last week held hearings to interview psychology professor Dr. Christine Blasey Ford about her allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Graham repeatedly expressed his anger and displeasure with the process. He accused Democrats of falsifying allegations against Kavanaugh for partisan reasons, and threatened to do the same to Democratic Supreme Court nominees one day, announcing, “If this is the new norm, you better watch out for your nominees.”

Graham told reporters after Ford’s testimony he didn’t think it was strong enough to impugn Kavanaugh’s reputation.  When a rape victim approached him, he brusquely dismissed her. Then, when it was his turn to speak during Kavanaugh’s appearance before the committee, Graham exploded with rage, yelling furiously that Ford’s accusations are an “unethical sham” and that Democrats are out to “destroy” Kavanaugh’s life.

On Sunday, a more in-control but no less impassioned Graham continued his crusade on This Week. He called for a “full scale” investigation into the “despicable process” that led to the hearings, and defended the limited scope of the FBI investigation ordered by Trump this week following pressure from swing Republican vote Sen. Jeff Flake.

ABC’s George Stephanapoulos asked Graham about the reports that the FBI will not question Kavanaugh’s Yale college classmates about why the nominee’s accounts of his youthful drinking—that he sometimes had too many beers but never blacked out or lost memory—differ so starkly from their memories of him as a very heavy drinker. Such questioning could be relevant to the allegations of another Kavanaugh accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who claims Kavanaugh drunkly exposed himself to her during a Yale party.

Graham defended this approach by the FBI, saying, “You’re trying to portray him as a stumbling, bumbling, drunk gang rapist.” He cited the six FBI background checks Kavanaugh has undergone thus far in his career.

Graham also wondered whether someone on Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s staff leaked Ford’s sexual assault allegations to the press, a charge both her office and the journalists who first reported on Ford’s letter have repeatedly denied.

In the end, Graham said he was confident Kavanaugh would be confirmed to the high court. 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate