Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Ending Protections for 250,000 Immigrants

The decision cites evidence that President Donald Trump is biased against “non-white, non-European immigrants.”

Ariely Murrilo, a U.S. citizen, holds the hand of her mother, a TPS holder from El Salvador, in Los Angeles in August.Mario Tama/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for about 250,000 immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan. Judge Edward Chen wrote that his decision is based partly on evidence that President Donald Trump is biased against “non-white, non-European immigrants.”

Chen’s temporary injunction stops the Trump administration from ending the countries’ Temporary Protected Status before he makes a final decision in the case. TPS provides temporary work permits to immigrants in the United States whose home countries are recovering from manmade and natural disasters. Sudan’s TPS was set to expire next month, while the other three countries’ will expire next year.

The lawsuit, filed in March by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, argues that the Trump administration’s TPS decisions were improperly influenced by the administration’s “repeatedly-expressed racism toward non-white, non-European people from other countries.”

Chen’s order lists a number of examples of that bias. They include Trump’s call for a Muslim ban during the presidential campaign, his claims in June 2017 that recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that Africans would never “go back to their huts,” and a question he posed in January: “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?”

Ahilan Arulanantham, an ACLU attorney on the case, said in a statement in response to Chen’s order, “If these children’s parents were not from countries the administration considers unworthy of humanity, we would not have to wage this fight. But we do, and we will not relent.” Justice Department spokesman Devin O’Malley said in a statement that the department “completely rejects” claims that the Trump administration “did anything improper.”

Chen emphasized that ending TPS would also affect more than 200,000 American-born children of TPS holders. “Those with U.S.-citizen children will be confronted with the dilemma of either bringing their children with them, giving up their children’s lives in the United States (for many, the only lives they know), or being separated from their children,” he wrote. Crista Ramos, a 14-year-old US citizen who is the lead plaintiff in the case, said in a statement after the decision, “Ever since the TPS terminations were announced, I have been wondering how I can live a normal life if I am about to lose my mom.”

El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Sudan’s TPS designations were routinely renewed under both Republican and Democratic administrations. The roughly 200,000 TPS holders from Nicaragua and El Salvador have been in the United States since at least 2001. Haitian immigrants first gained TPS following the 2010 earthquake that devastated the country. The Trump administration decided to terminate TPS for all four countries, along with Nepal and Honduras. 

Chen said the need for a temporary injunction was supported by evidence that the Department of Homeland Security may have made TPS decisions to achieve a “pre-ordained result desired by the White House.” Internal government emails and a deposition from a DHS official who resigned earlier this year show that senior Trump officials were determined to end the temporary protections. They overcame objections from career staffers at DHS and the State Department who argued that conditions in the countries were worse than political staffers were making them out to be.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate