Trump Takes No Responsibility For Two Migrant Children Who Died in Border Patrol Custody

The president used the deaths of two children as a political talking point on Twitter.

Niall Carson/PA Wire/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Two children, aged 7 and 8-years-old, died this month while in Border Patrol custody. On Saturday, President Donald Trump offered his first response to the deaths, but rather than offering condolences he lashed out and blamed Democrats for not funding his wall, while trying to absolve his administration of any responsibility by calling the children “very sick before they were given over to Border Patrol.”

The two children from Guatemala, Jakelin Caal Maquin, 7, and Felipe Gómez Alonzo, 8, died this month while in Border Patrol custody in New Mexico. Caal’s father has refuted the Trump administration’s claim that his daughter had not been drinking water in the days before Border Patrol took her into custody.

Their deaths have raised questions about the health conditions of holding facilities and the lack of medical care available to migrants. They have also brought more attention to the pervasive and underreported problem of migrant deaths. Border Patrol has counted more than 7,000 deaths along the border since 2000, a figure that likely dramatically underestimates what has actually occurred. As the border has become harder to cross, deaths have climbed along the desert journey, often from exposure and dehydration.

But Trump is linking the deaths to his demand to fund a wall, a stalemate that predicated the now eight-day government shutdown.

Adam Isacson, a expert on Mexico and director of the defense oversight program at the Washington Office on Latin America, recently explained to Mother Jones how Trump’s immigration policies risk more migrant deaths. He pointed to Trump’s policy to require migrants to wait in Mexico while their applications for asylum in the US are pending. It has nothing to do with the wall:

If you’re looking at three years in Mexico, you’ll probably have fewer people approaching [Customs and Border Protection], approaching Border Patrol. You’re going to have many more people taking their children through the most remote parts of the desert and trying to evade capture instead of doing what they’re doing now, which is going up to a Border Patrol agent. I worry that instead of just young men trying to evade capture, you’re going to see three-year-olds with their parents trying to do the same thing. It’s just not going to work. People are going to die of dehydration and exposure.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate