South Dakota Lawmakers Are Trying to Ban Schools From Teaching About Transgender Identity

“The entire intention of this bill is to create stigma.”

LGBT activists hold a "We Will Not Be Erased" rally in front of the White House on October 22, 2018. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The South Dakota House of Representatives voted Tuesday to ban “instruction in gender dysphoria” for public school students in kindergarten through the seventh grade. The bill, which is now being considered by the state Senate, has been condemned by human rights advocates as a blatant attempt to discriminate against transgender students. 

“The entire intention of this bill is to create stigma,” says Cathryn Oakley, state legislative director and senior policy counsel at the Human Rights Campaign. The bill’s sponsor has said he aims to stop schools from “teaching and confusing our young children to be more susceptible to this dysphoria.”

The bill is short on specifics and it’s not entirely clear how lawmakers are defining the term “instruction.” But advocates fear the legislation could be used to prevent teachers or counselors from providing support to students who come out as transgender. 

“When you have kids who are vulnerable anyway and you don’t let the people they trust at their school answer questions, it can be really dangerous and leave these kids without any support in their school,” says Libby Skarin, policy director at the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota. “Are teachers not supposed to acknowledge the existence of their transgender students?” 

Oakley also says it’s possible that the bill could be interpreted to preclude classroom discussion of transgender issues entirely—for instance, teachers might be prohibited from mentioning the fact that a historical figure was transgender. 

The bill passed South Dakota’s House by a 39-30 margin and now moves on to a committee in the state Senate, where advocates believe there’s a good chance it will reach the floor. It’s one of four anti-transgender bills that have already been introduced in the state Legislature this term. One would have given parents the right to refuse health care treatment to support a child’s gender transition. Another bill in the House would prevent transgender students from participating in the school sports consistent with their gender identity. (A similar bill was tabled in the Senate.)

“It’s creating an atmosphere that is really harmful to the kids in our state,” Skarin says. 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate