Fox News Loses Out on Hosting a Democratic Primary Debate

DNC Chair Tom Perez made the call after reporting that Fox may have leaked questions to Trump in 2016.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump during the Fox News GOP debate in March, 2016, in DetroitDetroit Free Press/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Fox News has lost the opportunity to host one of the Democratic Party’s on-air primary debates for the 2020 election, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez announced Wednesday. The decision came after The New Yorker reported on the tight relationship between Fox and the Trump administration, including reports that the conservative television network had given then-candidate Donald Trump a heads-up about debate questions during the last election.

“I believe that a key pathway to victory is to continue to expand our electorate and reach all voters,” Perez told the Washington Post. “That is why I have made it a priority to talk to a broad array of potential media partners, including Fox News. Recent reporting in the New Yorker on the inappropriate relationship between President Trump, his administration and Fox News has led me to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates.”

According to The New Yorker‘s Jane Mayer, the late network chief Roger Ailes may have tipped Trump off to a debate question from Megyn Kelly in 2015 about his treatment of women. A second tip about a question on whether the Republican contenders would support the eventual nominee may also have made its way to Trump before that debate took place. Mayer acknowledges that it’s hard to confirm both incidents, but there is plenty of other evidence that Fox helped Trump during the election. Today, many of its shows operate essentially as the administration’s mouthpiece. Trump has close relationships with several Fox hosts, and his communications director is former Fox executive Bill Shine. And Mayer reported that, before the 2016 election, Fox News chose not to run a story about Trump’s relationship with Stephanie Clifford, the porn star also known as Stormy Daniels—a decision that reportedly came from network owner and Trump supporter Rupert Murdoch.

Fox News has publicly denied that the Stormy Daniels story was killed to help Trump. Kelly has tweeted that she does not believe Trump saw the question in advance.

Following Perez’s decision, Fox released a statement expressing hope that the DNC chair would change his mind. Fox has put in a bid to host one of 12 debates scheduled to begin in June. Presidential debates generally attract millions of viewers, making it a lucrative opportunity for the TV networks.

This story has been updated.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate