Roger Stone Just Risked Prison to Reference Roger Rabbit

Prosecutors suggest the operative, already in great legal peril, may have violated a gag order.

Roger Stone enters federal court on February 21, 2019.Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Roger Stone’s inability to shut up may land him in prison before he even faces trial. Despite finding himself in hot water due to an Instagram post just a few weeks ago, over the weekend he posted on the same platform an image that suggested he was “framed”—a move that may violate a recent gag order.

The longtime Trump adviser narrowly escaped imprisonment last month after he posted an image of the federal judge overseeing the case against him that included what appeared to be a crosshairs by her head. At a hearing focused on that Instagram post in late February, US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson left Stone free on bail but amended the terms of release so that he can be jailed if he violates her order barring him from commenting publicly on the case against him. Special counsel Robert Mueller charged Stone with perjury, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering on January 24.

Jackson’s February 21 order, which she explained in detail to an apologetic Stone in court, bars the self-proclaimed dirty trickster from “making statements to the media or in public settings about the Special Counsel’s investigation or this case or any of the participants in the investigation or the case.” This includes, but is not limited to, comments on “radio broadcasts; interviews on television, on the radio, with print reporters, or on internet based media; press releases or press conferences; blogs or letters to the editor; and posts on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or any other form of social media.”

Still, on Sunday, Stone suggested he had been falsely charged with crimes, referencing the 1988 movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

Stone deleted the image after an inquiry about it by CNBC, which first flagged the social-media post on Sunday.

Even though he deleted it, the damage of the Instagram post may already be done. On Monday, prosecutors cited Stone’s post in a court motion. “We note for the Court that according to public reporting, on March 3, 2019, the defendant’s Instagram account shared an image with the title ‘who framed Roger Stone,'” they wrote. They did not include an argument on whether Stone had violated the gag order, but they seemed to suggest as much by flagging the post.

Prosecutors’ Monday filing also included information about a book by Stone, which may violate the intent of Jackson’s gag order as well. On Friday, Jackson ordered Stone’s lawyers to explain why their client’s plans to publish the book “was not brought to the Court’s attention” in an earlier court filing or during the February 21 hearing. In a motion also filed Monday, Stone’s lawyers said the book, published online on February 19, was written prior to Jackson’s gag order. But the lawyers did not directly answer Jackson’s query of why they failed to mention the book.

Jackson can now decide if Stone has violated the gag order. If she rules he did, he will be in violation of his bail conditions and imprisoned.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate