The Last Question in Tonight’s Debate Did Exactly What It Was Intended to Do

The men proposed gifts. The women asked forgiveness.

Justin Sullivan/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It was supposed to be a cutesy, holiday-themed ending to a debate scheduled dangerously close to Christmas—”in the spirit of the season,” PBS’s Judy Woodruff explained. For the final question of the night, Woodruff gave the seven Democrats on Thursday night’s debate stage an either/or: “A candidate from whom you would ask forgiveness for something—maybe that was said tonight—or a candidate to whom you’d like to give a gift.” 

The audience snickered. Businessman Andrew Yang, up first, was speechless, biting his lip as he silently pleaded with his hands. “We could do a labor action and just go on strike on this one, Andrew,” Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren volunteered.

Finally, Yang spoke. “I don’t think I have much to ask forgiveness for—you all can correct me on this,” he began. He opted for a gift. “I would love to give each of you a copy of my book,” a tome outlining the logic of the “freedom dividend,” his signature proposal for a universal basic income. “If you like data, this book is for you.”

Pete Buttigieg went next, offering a wholesome pivot on the gift option. “We know what a gift it would be for the future of the country for literally anybody up here to become president of the United States compared to what we got,” he said. Sanders opted to give a “very, very different vision” of “a nation based on love and compassion,” while billionaire philanthropist Tom Steyer offered “the gift of teamwork.” Former vice president Joe Biden volunteered something along the lines of making everyone’s lives better. (Buttigieg and Sanders also mentioned that they, too, are the authors of giftable books!)

And who asked for forgiveness, you wonder? The two women on the debate stage: Warren and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar. “I know there are times when I get really worked up, and sometimes I get a little hot,” Warren said. “I don’t really mean to.” Klobuchar took responsibility not only for her emotions, but the reactions of others to those emotions. “I’d ask for forgiveness anytime any of you get mad at me,” Klobuchar said, fighting back tears. “I can be blunt, but I am doing this because I think it is so important to pick the right candidate here.”

There’s something inspiring about seeing candidates talk about their human moments. There’s something enraging about seeing women candidates be the only ones who do it. This is especially true given that Warren’s and Klobuchar’s respective emotional states have been a subject of fixation among male candidates and the media alike. Last month, Warren endured a news cycle that relentlessly questioned her alleged “anger” after Biden accused Warren of maintaing an “angry unyielding viewpoint,” something media critics quickly identified as sneaky sexism. A round of stories detailing Klobuchar’s alleged acts of rage directed toward her staff raised important questions about her fitness for office. Whether those questions would’ve been raised at all if she were a man is another matter altogether. 

Neither female candidate let forgiveness be their last beat on the question. Warren used her answer as a launching pad to talk about her personal, emotional reaction to stories she heard on the campaign trail, from “people who are really down to their last moments.” Klobuchar reinforced the notion she gets “worked up” because she cares so much about a candidate’s responsibility to “bring people along, not shut them out.”

At the end of his remarks, Buttigieg said that his fellow Democrats should rally around the eventual nominee, without doing too much damage in the process. “Let’s make sure there’s not too much to ask for forgiveness for when that day comes,” Buttigieg said. Everyone would do well to heed that advice.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate