The House Just Voted to Decriminalize Marijuana

Don’t expect the Senate to get on board.

Demonstrators march in support of marijuana legalization in New York in 2017.Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

From time to time the House passes a bill that would never in a million years be approved by a Republican Senate.

There was a House bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $15. Nope! There was another that would have mandated universal background checks on gun sales. Sorry. And yet another “to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation”—real controversial stuff. Fuggedaboutit!

Today, the House added a new bit of progressive legislation to that list: a bill that would decriminalize marijuana and expunge nonviolent weed-related convictions, which disproportionately affect people of color.

The legislation comes after five states approved marijuana reforms on Election Day, as my colleague Jackie Flynn Mogensen reported last month. Thirty-six states to date have legalized medical marijuana, and 15 have approved its recreational use.

No matter how you feel about the drug, the potential criminal justice benefits of legalization are undeniable. Even though people of different ethnicities use and sell weed at similar rates, Black people are nearly four times more likely than white people to be arrested for possession, according to the ACLU. The House bill would try to rectify this inequality by creating grants to provide job training, legal aid, and substance abuse treatment to people convicted of marijuana offenses. It would also offer funding to low-income and nonwhite business owners in the commercial marijuana sector. The bill may not become law, but it’s a big step in progressives’ push to alter the public image of cannabis from a dangerous, addictive substance to a medicinal herb that’s safer than alcohol.

This post was brought to you by the Mother Jones Daily newsletter, which hits inboxes every weekday and is written by Ben Dreyfuss and Abigail Weinberg. It regularly features guest contributions by our much smarter colleagues. Sign up for it here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate