A Federal Judge Overturned California’s Assault Weapons Ban—and Likened AR-15s to Swiss Army Knives

The Bush appointee called the rifles “a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment.”

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal judge overturned California’s three-decade-old ban on assault weapons Friday—and, in his ruling, compared AR-15s to a Swiss army knife, “a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment.”

California had previously banned assault weapons since 1989. The law was challenged in a 2019 lawsuit by California resident James Miller and a political action committee called the San Diego County Gun Owners.

Despite California’s ban on assault rifles, they’ve been accessible in other parts of the country and have risen in popularity. Judge Roger T. Benitez, a Bush-era appointee in the US District Court for the Southern District of California, tried to use that as a partial justification for his order, writing that weapons banned by California’s law were not “bazookas, howitzers or machine guns,” but “fairly ordinary, popular, modern rifles.”

“This case is about what should be a muscular constitutional right and whether a state can force a gun policy choice that impinges on that right with a 30-year-old failed experiment,” Benitez wrote. California consistently ranks among the states with the lowest rates of gun deaths.

Benitez said that he has granted a 30-day stay of the ruling, giving California Attorney General Rob Bonta time to appeal. “Today’s decision is fundamentally flawed,” Bonta said in a news release, “and we will be appealing it.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom also criticized Benitez’s ruling, calling it a “disgusting slap” in the face of those affected by gun violence and “a direct threat to public safety and the lives of innocent Californians.”

“The fact that this judge compared the AR-15—a weapon of war that’s used on the battlefield—to a Swiss army knife completely undermines the credibility of this decision,” Newsom said in a statement.

California first banned assault rifles just months after a shooting at Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton, California, in which a gunman shot and killed five children and wounded dozens of others. Since then, AR-15–style rifles have been used in other mass shootings, including the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut, in which Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people, including 20 children.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate