I’ll Take “Quit in Disgrace” for $800

Unpopular new “Jeopardy!” host Mike Richards abruptly resigns.

Mother Jones illustration; Willy Sanjuan/Invision; Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

What’s…an iconic TV game show that has been plunged into chaos by corporate personnel decisions? 

If that’s the correct question, the clue must have been Jeopardy! Back in August, the long-running quiz show finally named a successor to beloved host Alex Trebeck, who died of pancreatic cancer in 2020. Many fans had rallied around actor LeVar Burton for the job, but after a lengthy process overseen in part by the show’s executive producer Mike Richards, corporate overlord Sony settled on…Richards himself as the permanent host. To take the reins for Jeopardy!’s primetime and spinoff series, the conglomerate tapped The Big Bang Theory star Mayim Bialik. Since then, Bialik has come under heavy criticism for quackish public-health statements—and on Friday, Richards abruptly quit. 

Richards’ statement didn’t mention it, but a recent investigative piece by The Ringer’s Claire McNear (author of Answers in the Form of Questions: A Definitive History and Insider’s Guide to Jeopardy!) likely drove the decision. McNear’s reporting suggests that the network should probably have gone for someone like the popular Burton over, well, this guy:

Concerns about Richards extend to the Jeopardy! staff, with a source close to the show telling The Ringer that employees were blindsided by Sony’s announcement and multiple sources describing how staff morale has deteriorated under Richards’s watch as EP [executive producer]. Interviews with sources from Sony, Jeopardy!, and previous shows Richards has worked on, including The Price Is Right and Let’s Make a Deal, paint a picture of a showrunner who could be exclusionary and dismissive of longtime show employees—as well as someone who wasn’t shy about wanting to move in front of the camera. Says a former Deal employee who was at the show during Richards’s tenure: “When I worked there, it just seemed to be something everyone knew.”

While controversy over Richard’s ascension swirled, McNear reported, “multiple lawsuits” dating to his stint as executive producer of another major game show, The Price Is Right, gained attention. 

One suit was filed in 2010 by Brandi Cochran, who worked as a model on the show. It centered on the discrimination and harassment she said she experienced after becoming pregnant. At the time, The Price Is Right had recently laid off several models; the suit says that after Cochran informed Richards of her pregnancy, he “said to her, ‘Go figure! I fire five girls … what are the odds?’” which Cochran understood “to mean that Richards would have selected her for layoff if he had known that she was going to get pregnant.” After giving birth, she learned that her contract had been terminated.

As for Bialik, my colleague Kiera Butler reported that for years she repeatedly promoted anti-vaccine positions (before ultimately supporting COVID-19 jabs); has “hawked a questionable supplement that claims to enhance brain function, including in an ad that’s on air right now”; engaged in a specious crusade against birth control pills; and in a 2017 New York Times op-ed, implied “that women invite sexual harassment by dressing immodestly.”  

TV game shows have never been all fun and games behind scenes. Scandals have have regularly rocked the genre since its 1950s origins, and it’s not hard to make a rogue’s gallery from its long list of hosts. That said, on Friday, at least one fan favorite seemed to be enjoying the Richards drama from afar: 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate