Trump Endorsed an Election Denier Named Eric. He Didn’t Specify Which One.

Both have embraced the Big Lie. One of them—Eric Greitens—has been accused of sexual assault and domestic abuse.

Donald Trump

Rich Graessle/Icon SMI/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday, former President Donald Trump announced his choice for Missouri’s Republican Senate primary. “I trust the Great People of Missouri, on this one, to make up their own minds, much as they did when they gave me landslide victories in the 2016 and 2020 elections,” he wrote. “[A]nd I am therefore proud to announce that ERIC has my Complete and Total Announcement.”

This looks like a typo, but it’s a bit more complicated than that. There are two Erics among the candidates vying to replace the retiring Sen. Roy Blunt—Eric Schmitt, the state attorney general; and Eric Greitens, the state’s former governor. As Politico reported, Trump decided to endorse both of them (or neither of them, defending on how you view it) after a long day of lobbying from supporters of both. Spare a thought for Rep. Billy Long, whose years groveling for Trump’s scraps nonetheless left him holding an extremely sad-looking bag:

Endorsing two Erics is a joke, but it’s a particularly sick one. The de-facto leader of the Republican party—who has himself been accused repeatedly of sexual assault (he has denied the allegations, but has also boasted on tape about such behavior)—issued a quasi-endorsement of Greitens, who resigned from office four years ago amid allegations of blackmail and sexual assault. My colleague Madison Pauly wrote a detailed account of the allegations against Greitens last year, but here’s the most relevant detail:

Greitens’ former hairdresser, who is identified as K.S. in court documents, testified to a legislative committee that in 2015, months before he started his campaign for governor, Greitens put his hand “all the way up” between her legs during an appointment without her consent. Two weeks later, she went to Greitens’ house at his urging. During an encounter in his basement, she told the committee, Greitens took a partially nude photo of her and threatened to release it if she went public about their relationship. When she broke down crying, he allegedly coerced her into oral sex. “It felt like consent, but, no, I didn’t want to do it,” K.S. recounted to the committee. “Coerced, maybe. I felt as though that would allow me to leave. That’s what he wanted.”

In court documents filed this year, Greitens’ ex-wife alleged a history of spousal and child abuse, and she told the Missouri Independent that she eventually left the state with her kids because she feared for their lives. (Greitens has denied every allegation of abuse, and he insists that he simply had a consensual affair with his hairdresser and never engaged in violence or blackmail.)

It’s just very dark and bad, though not especially surprising, that an ex-president would back someone like that. Trump’s soon-to-be daughter-in-law, Kimberly Guilfoyle, reportedly pushed him to back Greitens by noting that the state party’s higher-ups were against him—which, yeah, no shit.

But the allegations against Greitens shouldn’t cause you to lose sight of the other Eric in the race—Schmitt, who actually leads the polls heading into the election and would be a major favorite against a Democratic nominee. While Greitens has sought to use Trump’s false claims of a stolen election to boost his own candidacy—he even traveled to Arizona last year to support efforts to “decertify” the election results in that state, and demanded “answers…not just in Arizona, but also in Michigan and Wisconsin and Georgia”—Schmitt actually used his official state office to back an effort to overturn the election.

When Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has been under indictment for securities fraud for seven years, filed a lawsuit in December 2020 attempting to coax the Supreme Court to throw out the electoral slates from three Biden-won states—a lawsuit so sloppily argued that it has since triggered a lawsuit against Paxton by the State Bar of Texas—Schmitt filed an amicus brief in support of his effort. His office then led the effort to get more Republican AGs to sign on; ultimately 16 of them did. Paxton’s false claim that those states carried by Biden had conducted illegitimate elections—and that therefore those results should be overturned—was the intellectual basis, such as it was, for January 6.

Schmitt is Paxton without the indictment—and now he’s got a very good chance of joining Josh Hawley in Washington.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate