Biden Said He’d Cut Incarceration in Half. So Far, the Federal Prison Population Is Growing.

His team recently announced that thousands of people released early due to COVID could be forced to return after the pandemic.

chinaface/iStock / Getty Images Plus

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

During his campaign, President Joe Biden pledged repeatedly to reduce the country’s prison population, which, because of racist policing and sentencing laws, is disproportionately composed of people of color. At one point, he said his administration could cut the number of incarcerated people by more than half, largely by investing in alternatives to prisons. Later he said he didn’t want to be bound by a percentage, but he reiterated that he hoped to drastically lower the number of people locked up.

But six months into his term, those promises are ringing hollow. The number of people in federal prisons is growing. And Biden’s legal team recently announced that thousands of people who were released early from federal prisons last year to slow the spread of the coronavirus could be forced to return again after the pandemic ends.

This is the most telling sign yet that this administration has criminal justice low on its list of priorities, despite the campaign promises to the contrary,” Rachel Barkow, an NYU law professor who served on the US Sentencing Commission under President Barack Obama, wrote on Twitter after the news broke. “I honestly don’t know how anyone who cares about criminal justice reform and works in this administration can stand by and let this happen.”

You might be wondering how it’s possible to send people back to prison after they’ve already been released, and the answer is somewhat complicated. The people in question are technically still in custody, serving the reminder of their sentences in home confinement or halfway houses instead of behind bars. They were allowed to leave federal prisons earlier than normal because of the pandemic: The virus spreads easily in overcrowded lockups, and federal lawmakers who passed the CARES Act wanted to protect older and medically vulnerable people who were not likely to commit crimes if they were freed. “All of them left with the idea that they were staying home,” Kevin Ring, president of the criminal justice reform group FAMM, told my colleague Madison Pauly during her investigation of this issue. “It wasn’t like the prison was saying, ‘We’ll see you back here in six months or nine months.’ No one thought that.”

But the Biden administration believes that many of these people who have not completed their sentences will be legally required to return to prison a month after the official state of emergency for the pandemic ends, according to a New York Times report on Monday. (The Trump administration took a similar position.) That decision could affect about 4,000 people who were convicted of nonviolent offenses and are now serving time in home confinement or halfway houses, according to officials who spoke to the Times on condition of anonymity. And though the state of emergency likely won’t lift this year because of rising Delta variant infections, it’s little consolation for people now contemplating being ripped away from their families once more. “It’s like waiting to be sentenced all over again,” Wendy Hechtman, who is serving a 15-year sentence for a drug crime, told the Times.

“If people are already out on home confinement, and they’re home with their families, and they’re not committing new crimes,” Inimai Chettiar, federal director for the Justice Action Network, told my colleague Madison previously, “then it does seem cruel and unnecessary and unreasonable to force the [federal Bureau of Prisons] to bring them back to prison.”

Not that there’s no hope for people like Hechtman. Congress could enact a another law that would allow the federal government to keep them out of prison. Or Biden could act by himself. Hechtman says she’s crossing her fingers that the president might use his vast commutation powers to shorten her sentence. On Monday, nearly two dozen organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and Amnesty International, also urged his administration to provide clemency to people like her who were released into home confinement under the CARES Act. “This is your opportunity to provide second chances to thousands of people who are already safely out of prison, reintegrating back into society, reconnecting with their loved ones, getting jobs and going back to school,” these groups wrote to him.

But convincing him might not be easy. According to the Times, Biden’s team is hesitant to issue a blanket, mass commutation because of the political risks involved if someone is released and then commits a serious crime. “I can’t begin to express my disappointment that the administration appears unwilling to use the clemency power to keep people out of prison who have already demonstrated they pose no threat,” Barkow added on Twitter.

The White House, meanwhile, insists it’s still dedicated to lowering the prison population. “President Biden is committed to reducing incarceration and helping people to re-enter society,” spokesperson Andrew Bates told the Times. “As he has said, too many Americans are incarcerated, and too many are Black and brown. His administration is focused on reforming our justice system in order to strengthen families, boost our economy and give people a chance at a better future.”

Yet if Biden is serious, he should look at the numbers in federal prisons, which aren’t trending in his favor. The day after his inauguration, more than 151,000 people were incarcerated in these prisons; today, more than 154,000 are. This increase “strikes me as pretty significant,” Douglas A. Berman, a law professor at the Ohio State University, wrote recently. (The federal prison population is just a small slice of the country’s total incarcerated population, which stood at 1.8 million last year, but it’s the slice that Biden’s administration has the most control over. And jail populations are rising again, too, after unprecedented drops in early 2020.)

It’s unlikely, Berman added, that any new Biden administration policies or practices accounted for the recent rise in the federal prison population. More people are probably being forced to start their prison sentences because vaccinations have eased infection rates in recent months. “That said, I hope I am not the only one watching this number closely,” he wrote. It will be “quite disappointing,” Berman added, if the federal prison population continues to increase, particularly because the coronavirus threat isn’t over: Currently, 180 people incarcerated in federal prisons are infected, and more than 43,000 have recovered. About 240 others died from COVID-19.

Unless Biden takes aggressive action, he probably won’t achieve his campaign pledge of cutting the prison population in half. As Nazgol Ghandnoosh, a senior researcher at the nonprofit Sentencing Project, explained recently, if Biden moves at the same pace he set as vice president with Obama, his ambitious goal could take nearly six decades to reach.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate