This Impoverished Texas Community Was Still Recovering from Last Year’s Terrible Flood When Harvey Struck

Low-income people often don’t have the resources to evacuate safely during a disaster.

Arbor Court Apartment residents evacuate from their homes during the 2016 Tax Day Flood.Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Tropical Storm Harvey dropped more than 50 inches of rain in Houston and the surrounding area, which has caused “life-threatening” flooding. Thousands of people have been rescued from their flooded homes and at least 30 people have died. But for residents of the Greenspoint community, the unprecedented storm hits them when they have still not yet fully recovered from another catastrophic deluge last year.

In April 2016, during a storm that was dubbed the Tax Day Flood, the Houston area saw 15 inches of rain in 24 hours, with most of it falling within a ten-hour period. Hundreds of people were rescued from the floods and eight people were killed. The devastation was citywide, but Greenspoint—an impoverished community with more than one of three residents living below the federal poverty line—bore the brunt of it. Alarmingly, 72 percent of Greenpoint’s multi-family housing is in a flood zone, so during the Tax Day Flood around 2,000 of those apartment homes flooded—some were still waiting for repair when Harvey struck. 

Poor people are more likely to live in places that are especially vulnerable to flooding and Houston is no exception. The city has no environmental zoning laws, so property owners decide how the land is to be used. In wealthier neighborhoods, residents have the political clout to invest in flood protections such as dikes to keep the water out; poorer residents do not. Several months after the flooding last year, residents of Greenspoint were still living in water-damaged and moldy units. Many residents didn’t have the resources to move.

By Sunday morning, the same neighborhood that had flooded last year was flooding again. While officers from the Houston Police Department used boats to help residents at the Arbor Court Apartments evacuate, the water on the surrounding roads had already reached neck-deep levels. 

Elsewhere in the community, residents struck out on their own to assist with rescue efforts.

Reports showed that the water was reaching the same level as street signs by Sunday afternoon.

By Tuesday, the Red Cross shelter in the area was running out of supplies and space.

Greenspoint offers affordable housing, which is one reason families have remained in the community and newcomers move in, despite how vulnerable it is to flooding. The federally subsidized but privately-owned Arbor Court Apartments are reserved for families of four making $34,600 a year. The 900 low-income families who live there must pay about one-third of their income in rent, and the government pays the rest. 

For privately-owned buildings, the government does not consider whether the building is in a flood zone before it decides to subsidize rent. The Department of Housing and Urban Development began subsidizing rent for the Arbor Court Apartments in 1991, which was six years after the Federal Emergency Management Agency listed the property in a flood zone.

After the Tax Day floods, Houston officials suggested the idea of a buyout for the Arbor Court apartments, which included demolishing the building and turning it into a flood detention basin, but the plan never materialized.

To complicate matters, low-income people do not possess the resources necessary to evacuate safely during a disaster: Cash for food, gas for travel, and some place dry to stay. And rebuilding can be an even more monumental task, as can be seen by the slow recovery from last year’s flood. This year, some residents evacuated while others chose to stay.

Nora Martinez, a 46-year-old Greenspoint resident initially told the Houston Chronicle on Saturday, that she wasn’t afraid of Harvey. However, when she thought about the last year’s storm she changed her tune. “I’m a little scared,” she said. “Because I already went through this.” 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate