Instacart Is Losing Its Argument That Contractors Aren’t Employees

Gig companies are losing the battle in court.

Levine Roberts/ZUMA

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Last year, San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott sued Instacart—the nearly $8 billion dollar grocery delivery service for misclassifying employees as independent contractors. Late Monday, a state judge agreed, ruling that shoppers in San Diego should likely be considered full-time employees.

That is a big deal. As I’ve written about before, Instacart has tried to weasel out of employer status by arguing it’s a “platform,” a common Silicon Valley turn of phrase to get out of the burden of employer status: health insurance, overtime laws, unions. And it’s even engaged in union-busting in Illinois when a few employees were organizing. (The union was eventually approved.) In the San Diego case, Instacart argued that the shoppers who purchase groceries for delivery are not really employees of the company, and thus, aren’t subject to employee benefits. Superior Court Judge Timothy Taylor disagreed, ruling that the City Attorney would be able to prove the shoppers “perform a core function of defendant’s business.” Judge Taylor granted the city a preliminary injunction in the case, which will take effect on February 28.

This order joins a decision earlier this month, from a federal judge, denying Postmates and Uber’s request to stop enforcement of AB5, the California law making it harder for companies to rely on contract labor.

AB5, which codified precedent set by the state Supreme Court in 2018, has been extremely controversial. Companies have used the law to say they were forced to fire workers; truckers have sued the state; freelancer writers have come out in opposition (even rallying in Sacramento). There is a ballot measure backed by major gig companies to work around AB5 for drivers. A slew of changes to AB5, both from the sponsor and from those who hate it, are appearing in the California legislature.

But increasingly, it’s looking like gig companies are losing the battle, at least in court.

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate