Next Up: GOPers Dig Into Social Security

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Not content with the GOP plan to upend Medicare and Medicaid, a trio of GOP senators have unveiled a proposal to go after Social Security as well. On Wednesday morning, Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Mike Lee (R-Utah) presented their plan to slash an eye-popping $6.2 trillion from the debt by reforming Social Security—all without raising taxes. How will they pull this off? By hiking the Social Security retirement age to 70 years by 2032 and reducing benefits for those who earn more than an average of $43,000 over their lifetime. The Republicans’ plan also makes sure to exclude anyone bound to retire (and vote) any time soon, by exempting those currently older than 56 years from feeling the pain.

In unveiling the plan, Graham called any kind of tax increase to shore up Social Security a non-starter and economically catastrophic. “Don’t raise taxes unless you want to completely destroy America,” he said at the Wednesday morning press conference. “It’s much better to give up benefits on the end side than pay taxes now.” Despite such extreme rhetoric, Graham and his colleagues presented their plan as a reasonably moderate option that didn’t go so far as to privatize Social Security, as George W. Bush had proposed years earlier. “You’re not going to pass a Social Security plan that increases taxes, you’re not having Social Security with personal accounts,” Graham explained.

Graham acknowledged that tackling Social Security in any form was politically toxic, noting that the trio couldn’t find any other colleagues—Republican or otherwise—to rally behind their proposal on Wednesday. “These are the only two guys we could find,” Graham said, referring to Lee and Paul, both freshmen members who rode 2010’s tea party wave. Indeed, even GOP Rep. Paul Ryan’s drastic 2012 budget proposal avoids drastic changes to Social Security.

It seems like no coincidence that the GOP Senators pushed out their plan just a few hours before Obama was scheduled to deliver a major speech on deficit reduction. Lee claimed that the timing was a mere “coincidence,” as the three had been preparing the proposal for weeks. But there’s little question that Republicans know their plans will stand in contrast to Obama’s remarks today. And it’s just the latest sign of how much the GOP has succeeded in moving the goalposts on the deficit and spending in recent weeks: every time the Democrats have accomodated them, the conservative flank of their party has pushed the debate even further to the right.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate