October 13, 2016

Multiple Accounts Emerge of Women Saying Trump Sexually Assaulted Them

Trump’s political crisis expands beyond “locker room talk.”

Donald TrumpEvan Vucci/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update, 11:46 p.m. EST: At least two more women have come forward with allegations of sexual assault or misconduct against Donald Trump. Natasha Stoynoff, a writer at People magazine, says Trump physically attacked her in his Mar-a-Lago resort in 2005. (A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign denied her claims.) NBC’s Rachel Maddow Show also noted that a former Miss USA contestant had claims of sexual misconduct against Trump.

In the days after the Washington Post uncovered a 2005 tape of Donald Trump making lewd comments about women and bragging that he had kissed and groped women without their consent, the Republican nominee has repeatedly dismissed his remarks as merely “locker room talk” and denied that he ever engaged in such actions. When asked during the second presidential debate whether he had ever committed sexual assault, Trump proclaimed, “No, I have not.”

But on Wednesday night, several news outlets posted stories with accounts from women who insisted that Trump had touched or kissed them inappropriately. The New York Times published the tale of two women who allege that Trump accosted them in precisely the way he described to Billy Bush in the 2005 video. The women decided to go public with their stories following Sunday night’s debate, the Times reported, each saying they were infuriated by his denial.

One of the pair, Jessica Leeds, described Trump groping her on a plane:

More than three decades ago, when she was a traveling businesswoman at a paper company, Ms. Leeds said, she sat beside Mr. Trump in the first-class cabin of a flight to New York. They had never met before.

About 45 minutes after takeoff, she recalled, Mr. Trump lifted the armrest and began to touch her.

According to Ms. Leeds, Mr. Trump grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt.

“He was like an octopus,” she said. “His hands were everywhere.”

She fled to the back of the plane. “It was an assault,” she said.

The other woman, Rachel Crooks, told the Times she met Trump in an elevator in 2005 and that, after she introduced herself, Trump began kissing her on the cheek and then on the mouth. Crooks recalled that Trump later tried to get her number to pass it on to his modeling agency—an agency that, as several models told Mother Jones, exploited its models and also encouraged models to flout immigration laws.

In an interview with the Times, Trump denied the women’s accounts, asserting, “None of this ever took place.” The campaign later released a statement calling the entire article “fiction” and a smear attempt.

The Times story adds to a litany of reports that have recently emerged alleging Trump sexually assaulted women and acted inappropriately. A Florida woman says Trump groped her without consent in 2004, according to the Palm Beach Post. Cassandra Searles, who was Miss Washington 2013, has also claimed that Trump groped her. Four women who competed in a 1997 Teen USA beauty pageant told BuzzFeed News that Trump walked in on them while they were changing. And during a Miss USA beauty pageant in 2001, Trump entered a dressing room while the contestants were changing into bikinis.

Many of these accounts jibe with Trump’s boasts to Billy Bush. Trump, though, insists that was just talk. But Trump, who has tried to make the actions of Bill Clinton from two to three decades ago a campaign issue, is confronting an expanding political crisis now fully focused not only on what he said about women but on what he might have done to these specific women and others. 

See the full Times video of its interviews with the two women below:

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate