Former Trump Executive Claims His CFO Could Reveal More Hush-Money Payments

“Trump would do that kind of thing and Allen would be the guy that would draw up the check.”

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, didn’t just accuse the president of crimes before the House oversight committee this week: He also dropped names of other Trump confidants and insiders who could shed light on other potentially criminal activity within the Trump Organization.

One of the figures likely to draw the most scrutiny from congressional Democrats is the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, whom Cohen named more than 20 times in his testimony.

On Friday night, a former Trump Organization executive vice president, Barbara Res, said that she “instinctively” believes that Weisselberg knows about additional hush-money payments. In an interview with MSNBC’s Ari Melber, she described how Weisselberg handled accounting not just for the Trump Organization, but also for Trump personally—and how that role would have given him a front row seat to any hush-money payments like those made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

“Trump would do that kind of thing and Allen would be the guy that would draw up the check,” Res said.

According to Res, the most damaging knowledge that Weisselberg has would include information about insurance claims, as well as any payoffs to keep individuals quiet ahead of the 2016 election. Weisselberg has long been a central player in the president’s dealings, and he signed one of the checks Trump used to repay Cohen for payments to Daniels. 

“Do you think that there are other hush-money payments that he would know about?” Melber asked Res.

“Yes, just instinctively,” Res said. “Lots.”

“More than five?”

“Probably.”

“More than 10?” Melber pressed.

Res demurred.

Federal prosecutors granted Weisselberg immunity last year in their investigation into Cohen. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the chair of the House oversight committee, has said that Weisselberg will “probably” be asked to testify before the committee. 

“Will he spill the beans or do a lot of ‘I don’t remember’?” Melber asked.

“I don’t think Allen would perjure himself,” Res said.

Watch the full interview here:

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate